Monthly Archives: April 2017

Deportation of Criminal Noncitizens – The Obstacles Faced by Trump

By Peek & Toland on April 28, 2017

President Donald Trump detailed proposals to increase the deportation of criminal noncitizens in his first week in office.

Undocumented immigrants who commit crimes will be prioritized for removal.

Although he scaled down a proposal to remove as many as 11 million undocumented immigrants to concentrate on up to 3 million with criminal records, doubts linger about the viability of the policy.

Writing in the Washington Post, Kari Hong, a professor at Boston College Law School, said Trump’s policies won’t work.

Criminal noncitizens face deportation

He claimed the approach will be expensive, bureaucratic and unwieldly. He cited the following reasons:

1 Criminal Records May Not Define Violent Crime

Criminal records are not always effective at separating violent and non-violent offenders. In other words, they are a clumsy tool to identify dangerous criminal noncitizens.

There are, for example, green card holders who are fighting deportation due to a crime like petty theft decades ago.

Hong said the definition of “violent” has confounded federal judges for decades. Until the Supreme Court finally stepped in, many noncitizens were deported from the United States because courts incorrectly concluded that state convictions for driving under the influence were crimes of violence. In one case in Virginia, spitting at a police officer was judged to be a violent crime and hence grounds for deportation.

2 The Immigration Courts Are Under Severe Pressure

Recently, in this blog, we highlighted the severe pressures on the immigration courts.

With the national backlog of cases inching up toward 1 million, the courts have almost no capacity to take on another massive influx of cases.

Hong said every noncitizen is entitled to a hearing no matter how he or she is rounded up. It’s not a rubber stamping exercise. As many as half of all those who appear before immigration courts win their cases. You can read about our cancellation of removal cases here.

At present, many noncitizens are waiting as long as three years for their hearing.

3 Deportation is Expensive

The cost of incarceration of noncitizens is extremely expensive. Trump has already floated the idea of building new immigrant detention centers.

Hong said as many as 30,000 people are currently locked up at an annual cost of more than $2 billion.

The growth in the deportation of criminal noncitizens envisaged by Trump would add to the costs of incarceration. More immigration officials would be needed to round up those set to be deported.

Hong makes the point that deportation was stepped up under the Obama administration and more than 2.5 million people were deported over the course of his eight years in office. Obama was nicknamed the “deporter in chief.”

However, the level of deportations fell during his second term, partly because of the costs involved.

At Peek & Toland , we realize this is a stressful time to be an immigrant, even if you are a green card holder. Our Austin family immigration lawyers can help you. Please call us at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Cancellation of Removal, Immigration, Immigration Reform

Tagged with: ,

Premium Processing of all H-1B Visas is Suspended

By Peek & Toland on April 27, 2017

Earlier this year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced it would temporarily suspend premium processing for all H-1B visa petitions.

The H-1B visa process is under review by the Trump administration. Many commentators viewed the announcement in March as a further restriction on legal immigration.

Stripping out premium processing eliminates the option of shorter wait times for a program that helps skilled foreigners to find work at US companies.

Premium processing of H-1B visas is suspended

Government suspends premium processing of H-1B visas

Premium processing allowed companies submitting applications for H-1B visas for potential employees to pay extra for a faster process.


Instead of waiting for months to find out if they were successful in the H-1B visa lottery, potential employers received a response within 15 days.

What is Premium Processing of H-1B Visas?

On its website, USCIS explained The 15 calendar day period starts when it receives the current version of Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service, at a correct filing address

Applicants for H-1B visas enter a lottery process. USCIS issued an approval notice, a denial, a notice of intent to deny, a request for more evidence or the opening of a fraud investigation for misrepresentation within the 15 calendar day period.

When the petition required additional evidence or a response to the notice of intent to deny, a new 15 calendar day period stated when USCIS received a complete response to the request for evidence or a notice of intent to deny.

How Much Did Premium Processing Cost?

Premium processing cost employers an additional $1,225. Processing of standard H-1B applications without the premium processing typically took between three to six months.

The suspension was imposed effective April 3, 2017. USCIS stated it would temporarily suspend premium processing for all H-1B visa petitions. The suspension is expected to last six months.

FY18 cap-subject H-1B petitions cannot be filed with USCIS before April 3, 2017. The suspension applies to all petitions filed for the FY18 H-1B regular cap and the master’s advanced degree cap exemption. USCIS said the suspension also applies to petitions that might be exempt from the cap.

Premium Processing Suspension Followed Criticism of H-1B Visas

President Donald Trump has criticized the H-1B visa system. These visas for skilled workers are the main route for foreigners holding Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees to work at US companies. In 2016, the demand for H-1B visas was three times greater than the 85,000 available.

CNN reported on concerns by the Trump administration that outsourcing firms were flooding the lottery system with applicants, picking up visas for foreign workers and farming them out to tech companies. The outsourcing firms were reported to be taking a sizable cut of the salary.

Although the visas are used to fill a skills gap, Trump has been outspoken about abuse of the program.

Companies seeking to obtain an H-1B visa are facing an increasing number of obstacles. You can find out more about the lottery process here. Call our Austin business immigration lawyers for a consultation at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Visas

Tagged with:

How America’s Busy Immigration Courts Would Swell Under Trump

By Peek & Toland on April 26, 2017

The nation’s immigration courts already face massive backlogs for deportation hearings. The pressures are predicted to grow further under the pro-deportation presidency of Donald Trump.

An article on 89.3 KPCC stated the burdens on the courts may grow exponentially over the next few months.

The station said America’s immigration courts were burdened by a backlog of half a million cases before Trump’s inauguration. The pressures in 2016 were unprecedented.

Cases being put on the calendar years from their initial hearing. More than 526,000 cases were stuck in the system stated the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University. California alone has 100,000 cases with wait times of 2-4 years.

Immigration courts face a massive backlog

Immigration courts face a massive backlog

Last year, we noted Texas has one of the largest immigration case backlogs in the country.

Immigration courts have a backlog of 89,000 cases in the Lone Star State. In Houston alone, the number of cases held up in the courts rose from 6,423 to 36,136 from 2010 to 2016, according to the report.

The backlogs reflect an increased emphasis on deportations that took place under Barack Obama’s presidency. Trump has vowed to increase the size of the deportation force by employing an extra 5,000 Border Patrol agents and 10,000 immigration officers.

Jennifer Chacón, a law professor at the University of California, warned the crisis was likely to hit in 2017. She said:

“This is the year that the crisis really came to a head. We’ve had growing backlogs, but people are getting their cases calendered for years from now.”

Reports also point out there are too few judges to cope with the demands facing the immigration courts.

We noted there are just six immigration judges on the bench in Houston. The immigration court’s caseload is predicted to double by 2019 without more judges being taken on.

Funding for the immigration courts has continuously lagged behind that of federal enforcement, according to the Houston Chronicle. The publication states the courts are still struggling with the mass migration from Central America to the United States in 2014 when many unaccompanied children flooded over the border.

The pressure on immigration courts has made legal proceedings involving undocumented immigrants increasingly stressful and fragmented families. Our Texas family immigration lawyers can help with your case. Call us today at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Immigration, Immigration Reform

Tagged with: ,

Texas Governor Seeks to Remove Sheriffs Over Refusals of Detainer Requests

By Peek & Toland on April 25, 2017

Texas Governor Greg Abbott is seeking the power to remove law enforcement officials who fail to comply with federal detainer requests.

The governor has aimed his comments at new Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez who has imposed a policy would limit compliance with federal immigration authorities in Austin.

Hernandez said she would restrict her staff’s compliance with federal detainer requests to hold undocumented prisoners.

Greg Abbott seeks to derail Travis County on detainer requests

Moves are afoot to clamp down on Austin’s status as a sanctuary city

The sheriff ran for office on a platform that included limiting compliance with these requests. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials make detainer requests of jails when they ask local law enforcement officials to hold inmates who may be illegally in the United States.

Detainer requests are sometimes illegally placed and done so without a warrant.

Hernandez’s stance is consistent with the policies of a sanctuary city. Austin’s police also have a policy not to ask people who are arrested their immigration status.

Abbott told Fox News he and other lawmakers will seek to push through new rules to remove Texas sheriffs from office if they don’t cooperate with federal immigration officials over the handling of individuals who are thought to be undocumented immigrants.

Abbott previously warned he will strip state grant funding from Travis County if Hernandez does not change tack. However, the sheriff remains defiant, according to media reports and has gained a national profile in the contentious immigration stand-off with the federal government.

The governor warned Texas sheriffs would also face criminal and civil penalties if they did not comply with detainer requests from ICE.

One opponent of the policy is Congressman Lloyd Doggett. He told The Statesman Abbott’s proposal was unlawful and neither the governor or the legislature has the authority to remove an elected sheriff from office.

Hernandez will honor detainers requests only in cases in which a suspect has been charged with a serious offense like murder, human trafficking or sexual assault. Federal agents obtain a court order or an arrest warrant.

Our Travis county immigration attorneys work hard to keep families together. If you have been hit with a detainer request, you may have rights. Contact us here for help.

Posted in Immigration, Immigration Reform

Tagged with: , ,

Texas Stops Issuing U-Visas to Undocumented Child Crime Victims

By Peek & Toland on April 24, 2017

Immigrant children who are abused have been afforded protection thanks to U-visas since 2000. However, that changed last year in Texas when Child Protective Services stopped issuing them.

To make matters worse CPS did not inform those involved in immigrant child protection, reported KXAN.

U Nonimmigrant Visas (known as U-Visas) were implemented in 2000 under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act. The U-Visa program allows immigrant victims of crime to remain in the United States for up to four years. Their family members are eligible to apply for a green card.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services defines U-Visas as visas for those who suffered mental or physical abuse. They help law enforcement or government officials to prosecute or investigate criminal activity.

U-visas are no longer being issued for children of immigrants in Texas

Texas CPS decided to stop issuing U-Visas last April. The immigrant support network American Gateways said it was not informed of the decision.

Edna Yang, the assistant deputy director, said:

“The fact that they are stopping these certifications means that there are thousands of children that won’t get an immigration benefit and won’t get protection that they really deserve.”

She said the fact CPS had not talked to any of the agencies working with immigrant children about its decision is disturbing.

The Department of Family Protective Services maintained its decision formed part of a routine review and was not related to immigration.

It decided there were more appropriate law enforcement agencies that could issue the certifications

KXAN reported only CPS issued the U-visas in the past. In the four years from 2010 to 2016, it issued fewer than 50 U-Visas in Texas and rejected 22.

A 2010 report from the Center for Public Policy Priorities (CPPP), stated undocumented children in state care are “more than five times as likely to come into care for sexual abuse.”

Texas Child Protective Services has been criticized for years for being underfunded and failing children it is charged with keeping safe.

The report stated more than 2,800 children at high risk of neglect or abuse were ignored for weeks by state employees. There were reports of dozens of children being killed in foster care.

U-Visas are intended to protect immigrant victims of crime. They are also meant to help law enforcement officers investigate crimes in a sector often unwilling to testify due to their undocumented status. It’s a concern when state agencies retreat from a program of this nature.

If you need advice on U-Visas, please contact Peek & Toland at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Immigration, Visas

Tagged with: ,

Homicides Rise Sharply in Austin and San Antonio

By Peek & Toland on April 21, 2017

Concerns about rising numbers of homicides in Texas cities including Austin and San Antonio last year were not just anecdotal.

Many cities experienced a sharp increase homicides of a magnitude not seen in decades.

A report on the TV station KVIA revealed the number of deaths seen in Austin was the highest in two decades. The city recorded 39 homicides, the most since 1997.

The rise in homicides at 75 percent was second highest of the nation’s major cities after San Diego in California. The highest number of homicides ever recorded in Austin was 52 in 1985 –  the earliest year the FBI had homicide statistics for larger cities.

Austin and San Antonio see homicides rise

Homicides rise in Austin and San Antonio

Austin police said in a report in the Statesman no one particular cause was behind the spike. They pointed to Austin’s rapidly growing population.

San Antonio has experienced one of the largest spikes in homicides in the country. Police investigated 151 killings in 2016. It’s the highest figure in 20 years and a rise of 61 percent on 2015.

The city’s Police Chief William McManus told the San Antonio Express-News a quarter of the homicides were spontaneous. Police figures found 40 percent of the killings to be related to drugs or connected to families or acquaintances.

In January, KSAT reported on measures announced by San Antonio police to curb violent crime.

The San Antonio Police Department implementing an intelligence-driven approach to cutting violent crime in 2017.

McManus said violent crime also increased about 9.2 percent overall year-on-year in the city.

The Police department is creating a new Violent Crime Task Force to bring together disparate units like gang and vice units and narcotics. It will combine their intelligence in a bid to counter violent crime.

Police will focus on targets in San Antonio rather than specific target areas, and go after individuals who are involved in violent crime.

If you have been charged with a violent crime, you are likely to be facing a long time behind bars if convicted. Some murder charges lead to the death penalty being imposed.

Call our experienced Austin criminal defense team today for help at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Criminal Defense

Tagged with: , ,

How Texas is Fast-tracking Juvenile Offenders to Adult Jails

By Peek & Toland on April 20, 2017

The process by which Texas transfers juveniles into the adult system has been almost routine in past years. However, the fast-tracking of juvenile offenders is under fire.

Recently, Houston Public Media highlighted the case of Miguel Navarro. He was just 15 when he stabbed a 20-year-old during a fight at a party at Katy in Texas. The man died of his injuries.

The Houston Public Media report pointed out the stabbing took place during a confused fight. Nararro and his older brother were abused for being Hispanics and attacked by the older group at the party.

Navarro was arrested and charged with murder the morning after the party. He was from an impoverished background and his family relied on a court-appointed defense attorney.

Juvenile offenders are being fast-tracked to adult jails

He was advised by his court-appointed attorney he would be treated leniently in an adult court due to his youth. The tactic backfired. Navarro was sentenced to 99 years.

Navarro is now 24. He has been behind bars since he was a teenager. The Houston Public Media report made it clear what happened to Navarro was no anomaly when it comes to juveniles tried as adults in Texas.

Navarro’s case will be heard by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. A recent case sheds new and disturbing light on how easily juveniles are transferred to adult courts in Texas.

In the 20 years from 1995 to 2015, more than 5,200 teens were certified as adults in the state.

Navarro researched the facts in prison. He found the case of Cameron Moon, another teen from Texas who was tried as an adult.

The Impact of the Cameron Moon Case on Juvenile Offenders in Texas

The case of Cameron Moon v. State of Texas, led to a change in the way juvenile offenders are treated in Texas. The Court of Criminal Appeals found a standardized procedure was used to transfer Moon, who was indicted for murder when he was 16, to the adult courts.

The Court of Criminal Appeals heard arguments from Moon’s lawyer that the juvenile court abused its discretion in waiving jurisdiction.

The juvenile court failed to provide a specific statement detailing reasons for the waiver.

Moon’s attorney said the juvenile court misunderstood and misapplied the factors it was meant to consider in whether to waive jurisdiction. The conclusions the juvenile court reached about Moon’s sophistication and maturity were not supported by the evidence.

The Court of Criminal Appeals said the evidence the juvenile court used related to assess Moon’s sophistication and maturity was inadequate. The court said the evidence used to support the findings about the protection of the public and the likelihood of Moon’s rehabilitation was also flawed.

Unlike the adult system, the juvenile justice system has an emphasis on the rehabilitation of offenders.

The Moon decision led to new legislation and has meant waivers to adult courts can no longer be rubber stamped. An upsurge in appeals is likely.

If you are a juvenile who has been charged with a serious crime, you will likely to face an adult court. A conviction at a young age can ruin your future. Call Peek & Toland for a consultation at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Criminal Defense

Tagged with: ,

Trump Issues Executive Order on H-1B Visas Under ‘America First’ Campaign

By Peek & Toland on April 19, 2017

Trump Issues Executive Order on H-1B Visas Under ‘America First’ Campaign
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on H-1B visas this month, ordering a review intended to eliminate abuses of the system.

Trump signed the executive order on April 18 at the headquarters of hand and power tool manufacturer Snap-on Inc. in Wisconsin. He said it will help American workers whose jobs are threatened by skilled immigrants. The order outlines a fundamental review of the system by agency heads.

Trump took aim at what he said are hiring abuses in a visa program heavily used by U.S. technology companies. He issued the order as part of his ‘America First’ campaign.
The H-1B visa program is one of the most important mechanisms companies use to bring skilled overseas workers to the United States. There is a cap of 65,000 visas issued every year and a 20,000 cap for master’s visas. Immigration authorities receive far more applications than visas are available and they go into a lottery system. In April, 236,000 H-1B visa applications were received.

Trump was critical of the H-1B visa system during the election campaign. In March, the Trump administration suspended the expediting of H-1B visas.The executive order is the first comprehensive announcement from the Trump administration about the fate of the H-1B program. However, the executive order is vague and leaves unanswered questions, according to commentators.

What the New Executive Order on H-1B Visas is Likely to Do

1. Force Companies to Pay More
Concerns that companies are using H-1B visas to hire cheap foreign workers who undercut the local workforce means the review is likely to up the wages employers must pay visa recipients.
The administration has indicated it will change the way the “prevailing wage” is worked out for H-1B visa calculations. It could start handing out visas for the highest-paid jobs and best-educated employees instead of giving work to any applicant who meets the basic requirements for the visa.

2. Crack Down on Outsourcing Firms Using Visas
The executive order is also intended to target outsourcing firms that apply for large numbers of H-1Bs to staff call centers. These firms are accused of bringing tech workers over from India on low wages for short time periods. Requiring firms to pay more could be a disincentive to the outsourcing firms.

3. Ending the Lottery
Trump has pledged to end the “random lottery” presently used to allocate the 85,000 H-1B visas every April and to replace it with a “merit-based” system.

4. Seek New Rules from Agencies to Stop Abuse of the System
The order directs U.S. agencies to propose rules that will prevent immigration fraud and abuse in the program.

What the New Executive Order on H-1B Visas Doesn’t Do

1. Provides a timetable for changes to the H-1B visa system
While agencies have been asked to come up with proposals, no timetable is set out in the order for the implementation of changes. However, the order says department heads should submit a report within 220 days of the date of the order and “shall include specific recommendations to strengthen implementation of Buy American Laws, including domestic procurement preference policies and programs.”

2. Set out a Mechanism for Change
Changes to the H-1B visa program require Congressional approval because the terms of the program are set out in the 1965 Immigration and Nationalization Act. The executive order does not contain any guidance about how changes would be implemented.

3. Provide Hard Figures
The executive order does not suggest a wage companies should pay skilled foreign workers or give guidance about the number of visas that will be issued in the future.

Notwithstanding the many unanswered questions, it’s clear the government’s direction on H-1B visas is a restrictive one. In these confusing times it makes sense to hire an experienced Austin business and immigration lawyer. Call us at (512) 474-4445 for a consultation.

Posted in Visas

Tagged with: ,

Texas Father Admits Hate Crime Hoax, Say Reports

By Peek & Toland on April 19, 2017

Texas and other states experienced a surge in hate crimes in the days and weeks after the presidential election. However, one well-documented incident in Texas appears ton have been a hate crime hoax.

Authorities in Texas said David Williams admitted to vandalizing his own Fort Worth-area home and making it look like a hate crime.

A report on Fusion said Williams, of Denton, claimed he woke up with his wife Jenny on Dec. 12 to find the family’s vehicles on fire. Racist graffiti directed at African Americans was painted across the family’s garage. Williams and his family are white.

Williams told the Denton Record-Chronicle he believed “punk kids” committed the vandalism. The newspaper later reported Williams admitted responsibility for the incident. Jenny Williams said her husband’s head was “definitely not in the right place.”

Hate crime hoax made headlines

Williams faced being charged with arson at a minimum over the hate crime hoax, according to Denton Fire Department spokesperson David Hedges.

However, reports said David Williams was being held in a mental health facility. Authorities were looking at whether any other charges should be brought.

When an Offense is a Hate Crime Hoax

Although the idea of staging a hate crime seems bizarre, it’s not the only apparent hate crime hoax. There are other examples of this taking place across the country.

The incidents illustrate how false claims about crimes can be made for a variety of reasons. Sadly, in some cases the wrong people end up arrested for these crimes.

Last year the so-called “San Antonio Four” were exonerated by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The four women were accused in 1994 of the sexual assault of two young girls.

In 2012, the younger accuser recanted her story. It appears the girls were pressurized to invent the story by a family member.

More false claims concern sexual offenses than other crimes. Recently, Bloomberg reported how statistically between 2 percent and 8 percent of all reported rapes are found to be false.

The issue came to the fore over the recent controversial report by Rolling Stone about a rape at the University of Virginia that was later discredited. However, only about 40 percent of rapes are reported.

The Bloomberg article pointed out that means for every false accusation of sexual assault, about 100 rapes are committed.

If you have been charged with an offense such as a hate crime or a sexual offense, witness evidence may be flawed. An experienced Austin criminal defense lawyer can exploit weaknesses in the prosecution case. Call us for a consultation at (512) 474-4445 and read about our credentials on our website.


Posted in Criminal Defense

Tagged with: ,

The International Entrepreneur Rule is Finalized

By Peek & Toland on April 18, 2017

The International Entrepreneur Rule was one of the last immigration reforms to come out of the Department of Homeland Security under the Obama administration.

In January, the department released its final international entrepreneur rule. It was published in the Federal Register on Jan. 17.

The Department of Homeland Security says the amended rule will encourage foreign entrepreneurs to set up business entities in the United States with “high growth potential.”

The rule will go into effect 180 days after publication. Within that time it could still be derailed by Congress or President Donald Trump.

The International Entrepreneur Rule is Finalized

Following the publication of the rule in August, the public and other responders were given 45 days to comment. Although Trump has taken a hard line on immigration, an article in Small Business Trends speculated that the new president may want to retain it.

The final rule contains some changes to the one we discussed earlier in a blog. The amendments are intended to make it easier for foreign investors to take advantage of the rule.

Changes in the Finalized International Entrepreneur Rule

  1. The minimum investment required from a qualifying investor is now $250,000. The original rule floated an amount of $345,000.
  2. The final rule contains relaxations on the requirements to be a “qualified Investor” under the rule.
  3. Under the final rule, a foreign entrepreneur must have an ownership interest of at least 10 percent for initial parole, and at least 5 percent to be eligible for a second period of re-parole. The proposed rule had set the minimums at 15 percent for initial parole and 10 percent for re-parole.
  4. The final rule relaxes the job and revenue creation requirements from initial indications in the proposed rule. The applicant must show the enterprise creates at least five full-time jobs in the first period of parole.

The final rule will make it easier for foreign entrepreneurs. However, there are still a considerable number of hurdles to be negotiated.

In contrast to the EB-5 Investor program which we detail here, those taking advantage of the International Entrepreneur Rule do not gain eligibility for a green card by taking part.

An experienced Austin immigration lawyer can help you to take advantage of this new program. Please call us at (512) 474-4445.

Posted in Immigration

Tagged with: ,

How Can We Help You?

Our team is standing by to help. Call us at (512) 474-4445 or complete this form to send a message about your legal situation.