AG Rules in Matter of L-E-A

By Peek & Toland on October 19, 2019

Attorney General William Barr has issued a ruling in Matter of L-E-A that overrules Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) precedent. In this case, Barr denied asylum relief to a Mexican national who fled the country due to cartel violence. Specifically, the asylum seeker alleged violence by a gang who were targeting his father’s store under the direction of a local cartel.

In his ruling, Barr considerably narrowed eligibility for asylum based on persecution as a result of membership in a particular social group, which in this case was a family-based group. Barr stated in the decision that membership in a family group did not constitute membership in a particular social group for asylum purposes. To qualify, the group must be socially distinct in the eyes of society, not the eyes of the persecutor.

AG Rules in Matter of L-E-A

As a result of this ruling, it appears that even if a gang threatens to torture and kill individuals or their families, it is not a basis for asylum. Even if a gang or cartel has targeted a family for violence, immigrants are ineligible for asylum based on their status as immediate family members.

Immigration law experts claim that the L-E-A decision rewrites years of immigration law precedent. Some also see the decision as a specific assault on the influx of Central American migrants. Many of these individuals have suffered violence or threats to themselves or their family members from cartels and gangs.

Federal law permits the Attorney General to overrule BIA decisions since the BIA is part of the Justice Department. This is the second time this year that Barr has overruled a BIA decision, on the heels of his predecessor, Sessions, who took the same steps during his tenure as Attorney General. All these decisions seem to have the common purpose of not only limiting asylum in general but surreptitiously limiting asylum for Central American migrants.

No matter the type of immigration issue you are facing, the skilled and knowledgeable immigration lawyers of Peek & Toland are here to assist you. We handle many different types of immigration cases every day and have the kind of strategic experience and skills that are necessary to reach the desired outcome. By calling our office as quickly as possible after your legal issue arises, we will have the best opportunity to resolve your immigration law case successfully.

Posted in Immigration Reform

Tagged with: ,

AG Publishes Final Rule to Expand His Authority Over Immigration Law

By Peek & Toland on September 22, 2019

Attorney General William Barr recently took an unusual step to expand his authority to change immigration law vastly. Barr resurrected an 11-year-old proposed regulation and made it final within 60 days without any opportunity for the public comment. Typically, a set period of notice and comment occurs before a federal government agency publishes a final rule or regulation. Under this rule, the Attorney General immediately can declare any Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decisions as precedent binding on immigration judges, without being subject to any checks and balances or utilizing the standard procedures. The regulation was proposed during the George W. Bush administration, but it was never finalized until the current administration suddenly revived it.

According to critics, the finalization of this rule has allowed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to continue to strip immigration judges of their decision-making power and attempt to influence their decisions. The rule also has reignited a call for the immigration court system to operate independently from the DOJ.

AG Publishes Final Rule to Expand His Authority Over Immigration Law

Barr’s first significant power grab since taking office is highly reminiscent of the tactics of former Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The former AG took various steps to limit the rights and due process of immigrants to remain in the country as much as possible. This rule essentially allows Barr to make immigration court decisions himself and exercise control over how immigration judges make decisions in immigration cases.

Under current law, immigrants who wish to challenge further the decisions made by immigration judges must appeal those decisions to the BIA. The BIA then decides those appeals, but their decisions remain unpublished unless a majority of the 21-member BIA opts to publish them as precedent for the immigration courts below. Typically, the BIA publishes only about 30 decisions per year. Under the new rule, however, the Attorney General will be able to declare a particular decision to be precedent on his own, which obligates the immigration courts to follow the decision.

Whatever your situation may be, you will need skilled legal assistance to work toward a resolution of your immigration matter. The Texas immigration attorneys of Peek & Toland know how to help you navigate through the maze of immigration forms, regulations, and policies, and get the relief that you need. Take the first step today and secure the future of your family in the U.S. Contact our office today at and set up an evaluation with one of our highly skilled Texas immigration lawyers.

Posted in Immigration Reform

Tagged with: , ,

How Can We Help You?

Our team is standing by to help. Call us at (512) 474-4445 or complete this form to send a message about your legal situation.