Trump Administration’s latest move to curb immigration involves assessing
thousands of dollars in fines against some immigrants living in the U.S. who
have no legal immigration status. The fines are against immigrants who are
subject to a final deportation order, but who have failed to leave the country
Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) officers are issuing letters to
selected immigrants, alleging that they must pay almost $500,000 in fines to
the federal government. According to ICE, the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA) has the right to impose civil penalties on immigrants who are subject to
a removal order or agreed to voluntary removal. The fines can continue to
accrue at a rate of $500 per day.
letters, which are entitled “Notice of Intention to Fine,” give the recipients
of the letters 60 days in which to respond before ICE will make a final
decision on whether to assess the fine. ICE stated that they are issuing the
notices on a case-by-case basis, considering the efforts that the immigrants
have made to comply with the orders. Many immigrants who currently are living
in the sanctuary of churches, for example, received the notices, which went to
immigrants in seven different states.
Historically, the federal government has not used these extraordinarily high fines as a mechanism to enforce immigration laws. Some believe that the Trump administration is using financial penalties as a means of stoking fear and confusion in immigrant communities and inducing the targeted immigrants to leave the country. This belief may be accurate, as the immigrants targeted have no money to pay such high fines.
The immigration attorneys of Peek & Toland have the experience that you need when you are seeking any relief or benefit under federal immigration laws. We will determine the facts and evidence that are relevant to your case, evaluate your options, and help you decide the best course of action for your situation. We intend to place you in the best position possible to achieve your goals. Contact our Texas immigration attorneys at our office today and learn how we can assist you through this complicated situation.
immigration policies have become harsher, more and more individuals appear to
be seeking citizenship. Historically, naturalization number peaked in 1996 and
2008, according to data provided by the Department of
Homeland Security. During
the first three quarters of 2018, however, 544,000 immigrants became
naturalized citizens, which was a 15% increase over the numbers from the same
time in 2017. Some of the growth may be attributable to immigrants who now find
citizenship to be a more urgent matter or at least one that they should not
further postpone. Some immigrants also cited the desire to vote in last year’s
elections as the reason that finally prompted them to seek citizenship.
The most recent
estimates available from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
showed that in 2015, there were about 13.2 million legal permanent residents
(LPRs) in the U.S. Nearly nine million of these LPRs would be eligible for
naturalization, which typically occurs after individuals have maintained LRP
status for five years or have been married to a U.S. citizen for three years. Naturalization
also requires paying a $725 fee and passing a citizenship exam.
The Trump administration also recently announced that it would be making changes to the citizenship test that naturalized citizens must pass. As of March 2019, the pass rate is 90%. USCIS reportedly is focusing on making changes to the civics portion of the test, although it may make changes to the English part, as well. The test features 100 civics questions; prospective naturalized citizens must be prepared to answer at least six out of ten questions that they are asked. Nonetheless, some are questioning whether the new test will be in line with the Trump administration’s hardline stance on all forms of immigration, including those that are legal.
At Peek & Toland, we care about helping you through your immigration problems. We will focus our efforts on advocating on your behalf and representing your interests throughout the immigration process. Our knowledgeable immigration lawyers know the best strategies for gathering documentation to support your goals. Allow us to handle your immigration case by sitting down with us today and discussing your situation.
The federal government
is increasingly arresting and prosecuting individuals for “harboring” migrants
along the border by sheltering or leaving food or water for them. In fiscal
year 2018, the federal government prosecuted more than 4,500 people for
violating harboring laws, which is a 30% increase in these prosecutions since
2015. The sharpest increase in arrests and prosecutions came after former
Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered federal prosecutors to place a priority
on harboring cases in 2017.
One such prosecution
recently has been in the news concerning the 2017 arrest of a college geography
instructor who works with a group called “No More Deaths.” The group routinely
leaves food and water for migrants who may be crossing the desert. Prosecutors
accused the man of three felony counts, including conspiracy to harbor
migrants. The man claims that he was not part of any plan to provide shelter to
migrants, but participated in leaving provisions for migrants in the desert. When
the case finally went to trial in June 2019, however, it ended in a mistrial,
because the jurors could not agree whether the man had committed crime. As of
July 2019, federal prosecutors dismissed a conspiracy charge against the man,
but plan to retry him on the remaining two felony harboring charges in November
There have been 250 migrant deaths in the Arizona desert since 2001. Most of the deaths were from migrants who suffered from exposure and dehydration while attempting to cross the 250 miles of desert.
No matter the type of immigration issue you are facing, the skilled and knowledgeable immigration lawyers of Peek & Toland are here to assist you. We handle many different types of immigration cases every day and have the kind of strategic experience and skills that are necessary to reach the desired outcome. By calling our office as quickly as possible after your legal issue arises, we will have the best opportunity to resolve your immigration law case successfully.
administration has taken the unprecedented step of sending immigrants who have
crossed the border without authorization to other cities for processing at a
rate of about 3,000 per week. As U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
officials struggle to keep up with the continuing surge of migrants, they are
flying and busing thousands of immigrants to other locations. These sites
include San Diego and Del Rio, Texas, as well as El Centro, California, and
Laredo, Texas. Processing of immigrants at the new location consists of taking
photographs and fingerprints and completing background checks and health
CBP is required to
process immigrants within 72 hours of their arrival. At no time in history has
CBP had to send immigrants to other locations due to an inability to process
them within the 72-hour timeframe. They also have insufficient space to house
the immigrants, which is available in other places. Most immigrants being sent
elsewhere are coming from Rio Grande Valley, Texas, and Yuma, Arizona. Some CBP
officials claim that the Trump administration also is considering sending the
influx of immigrants to other locations in the U.S., including Florida,
Detroit, and Buffalo, New York.
The exact number of
immigrants being sent elsewhere is unknown. However, CBP reportedly is sending
five planes per week to Del Rio and three planes per week to San Diego. Each
plane holds approximately 130 immigrants. Four buses with about 47 passengers
travel to Laredo every day. Likewise, vans carrying about 125 per day are
driving El Centro.
Although this change
in logistics usually would be part of a plan approved by the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) and the White House, CBP and ICE appear to have taken
control of this venture out of sheer necessity.
immigration lawyers of Peek & Toland have handled the immigration cases of countless
individuals and businesses facing immigration-related issues. We are here to
protect your rights and advocate on your behalf to get the outcome that you are
seeking. Call our office today at (512) 474-4445 to set up an appointment with
our immigration attorneys.
According to a recent report from The Hill, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) is seeking to establish rapid DNA testing at seven border locations under
the guise of a project dubbed “Operation Double Helix 2.0.” The purpose of the
testing ostensibly is to identify immigrants who are falsely claiming to have
family relationships when they enter or attempt to enter the U.S. The
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claims that immigrants sometimes pose as
fake families to engage in human smuggling operations or to attain release in
the U.S. more quickly. ICE intends to utilize a private company to carry out
the cheek swab testing, which should be completed in 90 minutes or less. The
test results allegedly will help Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents
identify immigrants who are violating the law.
ICE declined to
identify the seven locations in which they intend to launch the investigation,
stating only that these areas have an influx of immigrants. However, the
project did list California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico as potential
“testing” locations. ICE also added that the project locations might
change over time.
The initial project will involve the administration of 50,000 tests, with an additional 50,000 tests administered during option period one, if ICE chooses to exercise that option. Before seeking bids from contractors for Operation Double Helix 2.0, DHS operated a pilot DNA testing program in May 2019 to identify and prosecute false claims of family relationships between immigrants. Through the pilot program, HSI interviewed 561 families whose situation had indicators of fraud. Interviews yielded 95 fraudulent families, whereas the discovery of fake documents revealed another 176 fraudulent families. The adults were referred for criminal prosecution, and the children placed in the custody of Health and Human Services Department.
An experienced Texas immigration attorney can help you with all aspects of immigration law. We are here to evaluate the facts surrounding your case and present your options. Finally, we can help you make the decisions that will be most beneficial to you, based on your circumstances. Contact Peek & Toland at (512) 474-4445 today and see how we can help.
repeated threats via Twitter to close the U.S.-Mexican border, the Trump
administration has backed off its threats, stating that Mexico will have a “one-year
warning.” The federal government originally based its threats to close the
border on the perceived failure of Mexico to stop the flow of immigrants
entering the U.S. with no legal immigration status. The administration then
altered the focus of its threats from stopping immigrants from crossing the
border illegally to stopping the flow of illegal drugs across the border.
In its abrupt
reversal on this issue, the Trump administration then broached the idea of placing
a tariff on all vehicles coming out of Mexico, as well as other products, if
the flow of illegal drugs across the border did not case. Now, however, the
Trump administration has backed off those threats as well, deciding to “hold
off” on any auto tariffs for at least six months. Auto tariffs would
predominantly affect Europe and Japan, and the administration is using the
threat of tariffs to pressure the two into making concessions in trade talks.
Amidst a quickly spiraling trade dispute with China, the U.S. most recently made efforts to resolve ongoing tensions with Canada and Mexico by lifting import taxes on steel and aluminum. The move caused those countries to retract retaliatory tariffs that they had placed on various goods flowing into the U.S. These efforts cleared one of the roadblocks to a NAFTA alternative that the Trump administration has been working on since last year. One of the goals is to prevent cheap imports of steel and aluminum from entering North America, which primarily targets China. Many countries historically have criticized China for flooding markets with metal and driving down prices worldwide, which has hurt U.S. metal producers. When facing any immigration issue, you are likely to need the legal advice that only experienced Texas immigration attorneys can offer you. Peek & Toland provides strong legal representation on a regular basis for individuals, families, and businesses who are dealing with immigration problems. It is our priority is to represent your interests and protect your rights. Call us at (512) 474-4445 and schedule an appointment to speak with us today.
The U.S. Supreme
Court recently issued its much-awaited ruling in Nielsen v. Preap. This case concerned whether a federal
statute, or 8 U.S.C. 1226(c), provided for mandatory immigrant
detention for a certain class of noncitizen immigrants. If the statute applied
to these immigrants, then they would be subject to detention indefinitely
without the opportunity for a bond hearing. These immigrants argued that mandatory
detention without bond as provided for in the statute did not apply to them because
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not take them into immigration
custody until many years after they had been released from custody for a
criminal offense. In many cases, these immigrants were legal permanent
residents who had not had additional criminal charges or trouble during the
interceding years. As a result, these individuals maintained that they should
be entitled to a bond hearing to determine whether their detention was legal.
plurality of the Supreme Court agreed with the federal government’s argument
that these immigrants fell within one of the four specifically-defined groups
of immigrants contemplated in the statute. Therefore, the Court concluded that the
lapse of time between the immigrants’ criminal detention and immigration
detention was irrelevant and did not remove them from the application of the
plain language of the statute.
The dissent criticized the broad reach of the ruling, as it effectively subjected a whole class of immigrants to indefinite mandatory detention without even a bond hearing to challenge their detention. Thus, even if the immigrants later prove themselves to be not subject to removal for one reason or another, they still will have spent months or even years detained without bond. The dissent saw this as a major constitutional problem. At Peek & Toland, we care about helping you obtain through your immigration problems. We will focus our efforts on advocating on your behalf and representing your interests throughout the immigration process. Our knowledgeable immigration lawyers know the best strategies for gathering documentation to support your goals. Allow us to handle your immigration law case by sitting down with us today and discussing your situation.
A federal judge
recently blocked the Texas state election officials from removing individuals
from the state’s voter rolls based on certain unreliable data regarding
citizenship. Although counties can investigate the citizenship of voters, the
court ruling prevents them from personally contacting the voters to demand
proof of citizenship.
The pending lawsuit
stems from acting Secretary of State David Whitley using reports from the
Department of Public Safety stating that certain individuals were noncitizens
to purge the state’s voter rolls. The Secretary of State’s office announced
that 98,000 suspected noncitizens were currently on the state’s voter rolls,
58,000 of whom had voted at some point over the last 22 years. The office sent
the names of these suspected noncitizens to county offices and urged them to
demand proof of citizenship from the individuals. However, after civil rights
groups pointed out that the list of suspected noncitizens likely contained naturalized
citizens who became eligible to vote, the Secretary of State’s office quietly
withdrew as many as 20,000 voters from its initial list.
Attorney General Ken Paxton and President Trump quickly jumped to conclusions
of widespread voter fraud in Texas, the federal court disagreed. The federal
judge issuing the decision pointed to the state’s “well-intentioned”, but
inherently “flawed results,” that caused the illegal targeting of naturalized
citizens through threatening correspondence demanding proof of citizenship.
Following the ruling, Whitley met personally with the plaintiffs, a group of
naturalized citizens who claimed they were being unfairly targeted by the
Secretary of State’s office.
Acting Secretary Whitley defended the program in his confirmation hearings earlier this year, but he did acknowledge that his office could have presented the program in a better way. Senate Democrats later announced that they had sufficient votes in place to block Whitley’s nomination as Secretary of State. The Peek & Toland immigration lawyers are here to represent your interests and advise you of the best course of action in your situation. Set up an appointment to talk to us today and discover how we can assist you with your immigration matter.
According to an article published by Houston Public Media, Texas workplace arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents rose almost 4,000 percent in 2018. The number of people whom ICE arrested in 2017 at Texas worksites was 13; in 2018, that number rose to 519. About one-third (1/3) of those arrests were on criminal charges, whereas the remaining two-thirds (2/3) of the arrests were of immigrants who were working in the U.S. without legal authorization to do so.
ICE agents in Dallas made the largest
number of workplace arrests, followed by agents in El Paso, Houston, and San
Antonio. The largest workplace raid took place in Sumner, Texas, a city in northwest
Texas, which involved 160 arrests in August 2018.
The Texas workplace arrests represent
about one-quarter (1/4) of the workplace immigration arrests made nationwide. The
number of immigration workplace arrests rose over 700% nationwide during FFY
2018, which is the first full fiscal year of the Trump administration being in
office, to a total of 2,304 arrests. Of these arrests, 779 were for criminal
offenses, and the remaining arrests for administrative purposes, or failing to
have legal documentation to work in the U.S. interestingly, however, criminal
indictments and convictions have not increased as a result of the increased
From 2013 to 2017, workplace
investigations and arrests by ICE dropped precipitously, as the Obama
administration has ordered ICE to focus on arresting criminal offenders rather
than investigating workplace violations. When recently retired acting ICE Director
Thomas Homan was in office, however, he called for a substantial increase in
worksite investigations for possible immigration violations. As a result, ICE
initiated 6,848 workplace investigations in 2018, which was four times the rate
of investigations in 2017. ICE also launched 5,981 audits of workplaces in
immigration lawyers of Peek & Toland have handled the legal representation of
countless individuals facing various immigration-related issues. We are here to
protect your rights and advocate on your behalf in order to get the best
outcome possible in your case. Call our office today at (512) 474-4445 to set
up an appointment with our immigration attorneys today.
One of President
Trump’s justifications for declaring a national emergency to justify the
diversion of previously appropriated federal funds to build a border wall on
the U.S.-Mexico border has been the “billions and billions of dollars” that
undocumented immigrants cost American taxpayers. In a recent news article, one reporter shows just how untrue
this justification is, despite the widespread belief of the American public in
In fact, not only do
undocumented immigrants contribute billions of dollars in federal taxes each
year, which helps keeps Medicare and Social Security solvent, but they also pay
billions of dollars in state and local government taxes each year. According to
a 2017 report by the Institute on Taxation & Economic Policy, in 2014,
which is the most recent year for which data is available, undocumented
immigrants paid about $11.7 billion in state and local taxes. These taxes
include not only state income taxes, but also sales taxes, excise taxes, and
property taxes, which fund things like highway repairs, emergency services,
state courts, schools, garbage collections, and other municipal services.
Payment of state and local taxes by undocumented immigrants are highest in states with the largest populations, such as Texas, California, and New York. Estimates indicate that the state of Texas alone collected $1.6 billion in state and local taxes from undocumented immigrants in 2014. As a result, the federal government’s insistence on curtailing both legal and illegal immigration could be quite costly to individual states. The loss of undocumented immigrants, then, would be unlikely to result in financial savings to states. In many states, including in Texas, the absence of undocumented immigrants could result in the loss of billions of dollars in state and local tax revenue. Our goal is to assist you with your immigration concerns, whether family or business-based. We can evaluate your situation and develop the strategy that is most likely to be efficient and effective in your case. Regardless of the immigration matter that you are facing, the attorneys of Peek & Toland have the experience, knowledge and reputation that you want and need to advocate on your behalf. When results matter most, contact us at (512) 474-4445.
Use of this website, does not constitute, in any manner, an attorney-client relationship between Peek & Toland and the receiver. While the information on the Peek & Toland website is about legal issues, it is not intended as legal advice or as substitute for the particularized advice of your own counsel. If you are seeking specific legal advice or assistance, you may contact us through our contact page or the phone number provided above, or you may seek legal advice or assistance through another source. Filling out the contact us form, calling our office or emailing our attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. Transmission of information from this site or any use of e-mail is not intended to create or establish an attorney-client relationship between Peek & Toland and anyone else.
The information provided on the Peek & Toland website should not be relied on as accurate or correct as laws in specific jurisdictions change frequently. Please consult an attorney in your jurisdiction for specific question about the law in your area.